Editorial Vol. 17

The digitalization of archaeological heritage is no longer a future prospect but an operational condition that is profoundly redefining the tools, languages, and purposes of research. The contributions gathered in this issue of the journal clearly demonstrate how the intersection of Virtual Archaeology, integrated surveying, and HBIM (Heritage Building Information Modeling) is moving beyond the experimental phase to take on the profile of a true methodological infrastructure for knowledge, protection, and valorization.

The overarching theme of this entire issue is the model: an epistemological device capable of organizing heterogeneous data, linking sources, spaces, times, and interpretations, while making the steps leading from material evidence to critical reconstruction transparent. In this perspective lies the contribution on archaeological data models in HBIM: a multi-level framework founded on four integrated components: spatial, documentary, stratigraphic, and interpretive. The Common Data Environment (CDE) is identified as the place where data is transformed into shareable and updatable knowledge, offering the opportunity to manage the growing information complexity of archaeological contexts without losing scientific rigor and traceability.

Following this same line is the essay dedicated to San Lorenzo in Miranda, which develops a diachronic HBIM paradigm for a “palimpsest-monument,” where form, phase, and source become operational categories within a single representation system. The value of this contribution lies in showing that the information model can accommodate not only the current state (stato di fatto) of the artifact but also its past and future transformations, its persistences and its gaps, clearly distinguishing between surveyed and interpreted data. In this case, the model is not merely a technical tool, but a form of testimony to historical complexity.

The processual dimension of digital tools emerges clearly in the contribution dedicated to the excavation of Santa Maria in Viridis in Ashkelon, where topographical and photogrammetric surveys are integrated into the daily phases of excavation and sampling. The concept of reversible excavation, made possible by multi-scale models shared across different disciplines, fosters an archaeological practice that thrives on transdisciplinarity, with archaeologists, architects, geologists, chemists, and physicists operating within the same information space.

Alongside these reflections, the case of the Mausoleum of Cecilia Metella reminds us that integrated surveying remains, first and foremost, a tool for the critical analysis of architecture. The combination of laser scanning, photogrammetry, and autoptic (on-site) observation allows for a re-reading of materiality, reuse, and transformations, even challenging established chronological attributions. Digital technology does not replace the expert eye; it reinforces it, verifies it, and makes it reproducible.

No less significant is the direction indicated by the study on the Nuragic Complex of Palmavera, which addresses the transition from excavation to visual storytelling. Here, the digital model serves as the “invisible” base for constructing analog dissemination tools—panels, axonometric views, timelines, and narrative illustrations—capable of making the site understandable to diverse audiences. The theme of valorization is thus linked back to scientific responsibility: communicating without simplifying, translating without betraying.

Finally, the case of Priene, with the virtual reconstruction of the Temple of Athena Polias and the Doric Stoa, brings the problem of metric control and model quality back to the center. The verification of the Level of Accuracy (LoA) through the comparison between HBIM and the point cloud shows that if the information model aims to be a reliable research tool and not just an effective visual machine, it must be based on explicit validation procedures.

Taken together, these contributions outline a clear trajectory. Contemporary digital archaeology no longer coincides solely with the production of images or spectacular reconstructions; rather, it is defined as a field in which acquisition, modeling, semantization, interpretation, and communication converge into a single ecosystem. The challenge is not to accumulate more data, but to structure it better; not to reconstruct more, but to make the degree of certainty of what is reconstructed legible; not just to innovate tools, but to rethink processes.

This issue of the journal is positioned precisely within this horizon. What emerges is a scientifically mature framework in which the digital is no longer an external support to archaeology, but an internal, critical, and productive component. It is here, probably, that one of the most important transformations of the discipline is taking place today: in the ability to make the model not just a representation of the past, but a shared space for knowledge and experimentation on the past.


Cecilia Maria Bolognesi (Politecnico di Milano)


Archaeological data models in HBIM

ABSTRACT


This paper proposes a methodological model for managing archaeological knowledge within current Virtual Archaeology digital ecosystems. Starting from the evolution of the discipline, today no longer limited to three-dimensional visualization but oriented towards integrated platforms for analysis, documentation, conservation, and communication, research addresses the problem of structuring heterogeneous, geometric, spatial, temporal, documentary, and interpretative data. Goal is to define an information system capable of transforming the multiplicity of acquired data into operational, queryable, and shareable knowledge. 

Proposed approach is based on constructing a multilevel HBIM model, divided into four mutually integrated components: spatial model, documentary model, stratigraphic model, and interpretative model. Spatial model provides site’s three-dimensional metric base; documentary model organizes and georeferences sources, surveys, images, and archives; stratigraphic model introduces temporal and relational dimension of archaeological units, also including virtual stratigraphic units; interpretative model formalizes reconstructive hypotheses and scenarios, making degree of reliability explicit through reliability levels. 

Integrating the four models in a Common Data Environment allows correlating material evidence, historical sources, and interpretations, supporting research, protection, management, and enhancement. The paper shows how the proposed system can constitute a dynamic and replicable platform, capable of combining scientific rigor, data interoperability, and new forms of communication for archaeological heritage. 


Tommaso Empler, Adriana Caldarone, Pasquale Micelli
Sapienza Università di Roma, Dipartimento di Storia, Disegno e Restauro dell’Architettura


From Excavation to Visual Narrative: Methodologies for Enhancing the Palmavera Nuragic Complex

ABSTRACT


This paper analyses how virtual archaeology — now understood as an integrated system that combines rigorous scientific documentation with modern storytelling strategies — can be used to produce digital and analogue outputs. The case study concerns the Nuragic complex of Palmavera (Alghero), which was the subject of a digital documentation campaign conducted by the GRA·VIS LAB of the Department of Architecture, Design, and Urban Planning, University of Sassari, as part of the initiatives for the nomination of Nuragic sites to the UNESCO World Heritage List. The acquisition and reconstruction of the archaeological remains was guided by integrating the deductive method (based on the laws of statics and constructive logic) with the analogical method (based on typological comparison with other contemporary monuments). The research’s originality lies in its use of a digital model as an invisible foundation for creating outputs of high communicative value.  Axonometric cross-sections, timelines and narrative illustrations have been used to translate the technical data into educational panels that make the site accessible and understandable to a diverse audience, bringing together scientific protection with inclusive and engaging cultural enjoyment.


Alexandra Fusinetti, Nicole Proietti Cosimi
Dipartimento di Architettura, Design e Urbanistica, Università degli Studi di Sassari


Shape, Phase, and Source: An HBIM Paradigm for the Documentation of San Lorenzo in Miranda

ABSTRACT


The paper presents a diachronic HBIM paradigm applied to the complex of San Lorenzo in Miranda, in the Roman Forum, built onto the remains of the Temple of Antoninus and Faustina and stratigraphically connected to the Atrium Vestae. The monument, shaped by transformations from the Imperial age to the twentieth century, is interpreted as a complex palimpsest to be represented through the integration of form, phase, and source. The methodology combines integrated 3D survey (laser scanning, photogrammetry, and georeferencing) with the systematization of historical sources within a relational database structured by Topographical Units and chronological phases. The HBIM model is not conceived as a mere replica of the current state, but as an informational infrastructure that distinguishes surveyed, interpreted, and conjectural data, explicitly linking each geometric element to the origin and reliability of its sources. Transformations are managed through diachronic structuring and parametric operations of volumetric addition and subtraction, preserving the memory of continuities and losses. The extension to the adjacent excavation area —modeled from georeferenced plans and converted into BIM elements through VPL— tests the scalability of the approach in archaeological contexts lacking point clouds. The result is a multi-layered, queryable model conceived as a dynamic archive and epistemological device supporting research, conservation, and heritage enhancement.


Carlo Bianchini, Marika Griffo, Francesca Porfiri, Gabriele Giuliani
Sapienza, Università di Roma, Dipartimento di Storia, Disegno e Restauro dell’Architettura


Towards a Transdisciplinary Digital Workflow for Reversible Archaeological Excavations: from surveying to enhancing the virtual model

ABSTRACT


This article explores digital archaeology through an examination of the excavation at the site known as ‘Santa Maria in Viridis’ in the archaeological park of the ancient city of Ascalona (Ashkelon, Israel). The AskGate mission, funded by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation and led by the Department of Architecture at the University of Florence (with Cecilia Luschi as head of the mission), is studying the site. In 2022, the team, comprising architects, archaeologists, geologists, physics, and chemists, began excavating the site, integrating topographic and photogrammetric survey work into the daily phases of excavation and material sampling. The article presents the results in the form of a digital, multiscale model designed for sharing and consulting data from various disciplines. This model experiments with transdisciplinary solutions and virtual reversibility of the archaeological excavation.


Cecilia Luschi, Marta Zerbini, Novella Lecci, Alessandra Vezzi
Dipartimento di Architettura, Università degli studi di Firenze


The Mausoleum of Caecilia Metella: integrated survey and preliminary architectural analyses

ABSTRACT


This paper provides an overview of the Mausoleum of Caecilia Metella in Rome and of an integrated survey campaign based on terrestrial laser scanning and aerial/terrestrial photogrammetry, aimed at producing a research-grade model of the monument. Based on these data, an on-site autoptic analysis was carried out focusing on material traces that characterize the different phases of reuse, from the post-antique period to the nineteenth century. Particular attention is devoted to revising the chronological attribution of the elevated opening in opus quadratum drum.


Simone Lucchetti, Rossana Ravesi
Sapienza Università di Roma, Dipartimento di Storia, Disegno e Restauro dell’Architettura


Echoes of Athena: an HBIM approach for the virtual reconstruction of the Temple of Athena Polias and Doric Stoa of Priene

ABSTRACT


This paper presents the application of Historical Building Information Modelling (HBIM) in an archaeological context, using a case study of the monumental complex of the Temple of Athena Polias in Priene, Turkey. The research critically analyses the entire process, from data acquisition through digital surveying (laser scanning and photogrammetry) to the construction of the parametric information model, and finally to the verification of the Level of Accuracy (LoA) by comparing the HBIM model with the point cloud.


Elisabetta C. Giovannini (1), Laura Orsola Ochavo, Federica Racciu
(1)Dipartimento di Architettura e Design DAD, Politecnico di Torino, Italia


Editorial Vol. 16

Artificial intelligence and digitalization of cultural heritage: new frontiers for architectural and museum research

In recent years, the field of research on Cultural Heritage and architecture has undergone a radical transformation, driven by the progressive integration of advanced digital modeling tools and artificial intelligence. The contributions gathered in this issue of the journal aim to explore some of the trajectories outlined by this transformation, showing how the adoption of advanced and integrated approaches is redefining methods of representation, analysis, and management of cultural heritage. 

A first line of inquiry concerns applications related to architectural representation. The use of generative models based on diffusion-based techniques, such as Stable Diffusion, now makes it possible to experiment with stylistic transposition as a process of critical learning. Through fine-tuning procedures carried out with DreamBooth and orchestrated via nodal pipelines in ComfyUI, controlled by tools such as ControlNet, it is possible to transmit to AI models the graphic codes of figures such as Paolo Portoghesi, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and Le Corbusier. The generated results—coherent yet not imitative—demonstrate how AI, when properly guided, can act not only as an executive tool but as a critical agent capable of revealing latent structures of architectural style, opening the way to new forms of representation. 

A second research trajectory emerging from the articles presented here concerns the significant evolution of immersive visualization and spatial documentation techniques. One case involves the integration of spherical panoramas within Building Information Modeling (BIM) models, enabling more effective engagement with museum spaces. Alongside this, the use of Structure from Motion (SfM) pipelines such as GLOMAP, enhanced by AI-based approaches like Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting, allows the reconstruction of three-dimensional scenes even from low-resolution monocular or 360° video, improving both efficiency and quality of models for the purposes of heritage conservation and enhancement. 

Another field of experimentation involves the creation of datasets specifically designed for the classification of historical construction techniques, with the goal of training dedicated AI mod

els. In this context, the systematic collection of images of Opus Testaceum masonry is aimed not only at training supervised classification models but also at fostering a structured and interdisciplinary dialogue between archaeologists and computer scientists. This approach seeks to develop models capable of recognizing construction techniques even in buildings not included in the training dataset, thereby strengthening their generalization capacity. At the same time, the creation of open-access datasets represents a concrete contribution to the scientific community, encouraging further research and applications. 

In the field of conservation, experiments are emerging that combine Heritage Building Information Modeling (H-BIM) with convolutional neural networks for structural damage analysis. Case studies include historic churches such as the Church of the Compagnia della Disciplina della Santa Croce in Naples. The integration of crack-related information into semantic models makes it possible to move beyond mere geometric description, paving the way for semi-automatic risk assessments and interoperable information systems for the preventive management of cultural heritage. 

Finally, the theme of digitizing museum collections is addressed within the framework of the project MUSE – MUseum management, enhancement and accessibility: a Sustainable digital Ecosystem of interactive digital collections, with an experiment conducted at the Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Antica in Palazzo Barberini, Rome. Here, the construction of digital twins is understood as a critical process of copying, based on principles of data neutrality and process transparency, in accordance with the National Plan for the Digitalization of Cultural Heritage (PND). The objective is to define reliability parameters for digital replicas and promote a sustainable, interactive ecosystem of digital collections. 

Taken together, these contributions testify to a paradigm shift: artificial intelligence and digital methods are no longer mere auxiliary tools but active and generative components of the processes of knowledge, representation, and heritage management. They presuppose a critical and conscious preparation on the part of users. The hybridization of humanistic knowledge and computational technologies thus opens unprecedented scenarios, inviting us to critically rethink and relaunch the roles, languages, and responsibilities of contemporary research. 


Cecilia Maria Bolognesi (Politecnico di Milano)
Tommaso Empler (Sapienza Università di Roma)